Xenophobia… South Africa's call to support democracy in the region?


By Blessing Vava 

The recent wave of violent attacks targeting foreign nationals living in South Africa has shattered the country’s reputation for tolerance and goodwill. The South African government has condemned these acts of violence but insisted that it was not xenophobia but acts of criminality.

Many have blamed  senior government officials for triggering the violence due to the reckless statements they have been uttering in public. Many would recall, President Ramaphosa’s statements during a campaign rally in March this year when he said: "Everybody just arrives in our townships and rural areas and set up businesses without licenses and permits. We are going to bring this to an end.”  Other leaders have chosen to blame foreign nationals for the high rising unemployment rates and unequal distribution of wealth in an economy that is predominantly owned by a minority,  with a high population of the impoverished black population. 

However, it is such reckless statements by top government officials that cannot be ignored and the leadership has to take full responsibility. The booing of South Africa’s President Cyril Ramaphosa at the memorial services of Robert Mugabe in Harare is a testimony to the displeasure of the treatment of other nationals in South Africa. Respectfully, President Cyril Ramaphosa issued an apology to that effect. He further sent his emissaries with apologies to other affected African countries, with Energy Minister Jeff Radebe apologizing last week to the Nigerian President Muhammadu Buhari, on behalf of the president. Way to go Cde President. And recently Ramaphosa's invitation of President Buhari to South Africa was seen as a gesture to ease the tension between the two countries but however, the gesture is more to do with the massaging or should I say "safeguarding" the economic ties between the two countries at the same time doing less in addressing the root cause of xenophobia. 

In light of this, trigger happy officials like Herman Mashaba remain unapologetic over their stance against foreign nationals saying he personally does not think it is necessary for South Africa to apologize to other African countries for the recent xenophobic attacks. In Mashaba’s parochial mind he blames everything on foreigners, the unemployment of millions of South African youths, the drug syndicates and other related crimes on foreigners. But who really is to blame for the xenophobic attacks and the violence that has been a recurrent episode in South Africa over the past 20 or so years?

While not wanting to dwell much or point fingers, we can certainly not ignore the reality that the problems facing South Africa are bigger and it is only myopic to solely blame the country’s woes to other foreign nationals. Economic Freedom Fighters’ leader, Julius Malema, has condemned the attacks as acts of criminality. In a chilling speech at a recent press conference, Malema had this to say: Even if we were to put all Zimbabweans and Nigerians and take them back will still have unemployment.’’
  
However, some might argue that South Africa is equally to blame especially on how they have handled the Zimbabwean crisis. They argue that, based on its economic and political influence in the region, South Africa is extremely well placed to lobby for political and economic change as well as  encourage democratic practices amongst its neighbouring countries.  Yet, the successive ANC governments have failed to press Zimbabwe to have credible elections and have covertly endorsed an illegitimate government.

Indeed, South Africa is guilty of trying to patch up the Zimbabwean problems with ‘Band-Aid’ solutions, including former president Thabo Mbeki’s attempts to mediate between Mugabe’s ruling Zanu-PF and the opposition MDC parties. Mbeki denied that Zimbabwe was in a crisis, despite evidence of human rights abuses and election irregularities. He was effectively shielding the country from western intervention, declaring that the Southern African Development Community was capable of handling the situation.

Instead of turning a blind eye to failures of democracy in the region, South Africa has a duty to support the development and political stability among neighbouring countries and not to be an island of economic growth. After all, it’s not hard to work out that if the situation in Zimbabwe were different fewer people would leave, and there would be fewer refugees.

Blessing Vava writes from Chipinge and can be contacted on blessingvava@gmail.com


Robert Mugabe: Hero, Victim or Villain?



By Blessing Vava


“The good men do is oft interred with their bones” were the words of Mark Antony from his emotional speech at Julius Caesar’s funeral. In translation, Mark Antony is saying that good deeds often go unheralded, or even when noticed, they fade away in people’s memories so that they die with them. It’s a means of observing that good people are many, but that the memory of what they have done for the world often vanishes, but those who have committed evil deeds tend to be remembered for them.

Such is an example to describe Zimbabwe’s former president, Robert Mugabe, who died last week in Singapore at the age of 95. His legacy has drawn a lot of debate with contrasting narratives at any given time throughout his life and controversial 37 years in power. Often in life, there are rarely things that will capture people’s imaginations for very long and one has to be reminded of them over time in to order remember.

While many of us were not yet born during the World Wars, we know of names like Hitler and Stalin because of the evil things they did during these wars. Their actions were sufficiently impactful to traumatize a generation and have consequences for those that followed. This is how many Zimbabweans are remembering their former president who disenfranchised a whole citizenry because of his selfishness and grip on power. However, as the debate on Mugabe’s legacy rages on, his story and his legacy are not different from that of Okonkwo, a character in Chinua Achebe’s 1958 epic novel, Things Fall Apart.

An analysis of Okonkwo’s character strikes some similarities with Mugabe, from their upbringing until their demise. Those who read Achebe’s classic would know of a strained father and son relationship in which Okonkwo grew up hating his father and consciously adopted opposite ideals. As for Mugabe, his father abandoned the family when he was 10, leaving him to deal with a mercurial and emotionally scarred mother, according to Heidi Holland in her book: Dinner with Mugabe (2008). Mugabe had a strong resentment towards his father whom at one point he mockingly described him as a ‘polygamous’ man who abandoned them and went to Bulawayo where he got a ‘beautiful’ woman.  This explains so much about these two’s adult characters.

Consequently, Okonkwo was a man considered as a hero but ended up a villain who destroyed his village due to his ego and a bigger than life character. His temper and violent behavior made him mistreat his wives and others around him. Mugabe mistreated the whole citizenry and ruthlessly dealt with his opponents and even those close to him, for example,  Joyce Mujuru,  Edgar Tekere and Emmerson Mnangagwa, just to mention but a few. On the other hand, Okonkwo was single-minded in his image of manliness and abhorred pacifism. Whereas, Mugabe’s penchant for violence is well documented such that at one point he boasted of having degrees in violence.

Okonkwo fought in defence of his people and at the same time, Mugabe’s role during the liberation struggle cannot be rubbished as he led Zimbabwe to independence from white minority rule. During the former’s time, missionaries were more villainous than he was (Okonkwo), kidnapping the leaders without provocation and threatening to kill them, Mugabe walked the same road.

Okonkwo was a victim to his ignorance of other cultures and practices. However, his way of life was the only thing he knew and the new ideas and religion that attacked him from all angles were more than any one person could take.  Mugabe’s Christian fundamentalism, moralism , and his homophobic stance are a classic example fitting this narrative. Okonkwo, like Mugabe’s end, was tragic and in the end, the two can neither be classified as heroes, victims or villains entirely. To sum up, Mugabe’s legacy is a conflicted one that will be told in different narratives.

Blessing Vava writes from Chipinge. He can be contacted on blessingvava@gmail.com