By Blessing Vava
Zimbabwe’s 93 year old despot
Robert Mugabe’s 37 years hold on power has been checkmated and has reached its end
after the military put him on house arrest last week. In a Hollywood style of
events that left the whole world amused and confused whether to call it a coup
or not coup, something that puzzle military scholars for some time. Whatever
interpretation, the reality is that a coup was executed in Zimbabwe and we are
currently in a transition to a new dispensation and this signifies a shift in
the power dynamics, particularly in the ruling party. Already, high ranking
cabinet ministers have reportedly been detained by the military and more
arrests are expected. Unprecedented though that a majority of Zimbabweans welcomed
this ‘coup’ and have participated in huge numbers in the call for President
Mugabe to step down. No doubt Mugabe is finished, the march to state house and
the rally in Zimbabwe grounds was a decoy 'people's popular uprising' meant to
disempower regional bodies like the Southern African Development Community (SADC),
the African Union (AU) and United Nations (UN)not to censure Zimbabwe’s
military apparatchiks. Essentially, Zimbabweans were taken on a wild goose
chase by the military hawks despite warnings from Blogger Takura Zhangazha that
this was a purely ZANU PF succession affair when all this charade started.
 |
| 'Coup plotter? |
Zimbabweans had suffered under
Mugabe’s 37 years iron fist rule to an extent that they had reached a point
that anything else and not Mugabe was good. One thing for sure, the calls for
Mugabe to go attracted Zimbabweans from all walks of life; from the opposition,
civil society, churches, civil service, the Zimbabwe African National Union
Patriotic Front (ZANU PF), the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) Alliance,
the National Rainbow Coalition (NRC) among many others and other sections of
society. However, there is a danger to it in the sense that whatever is
happening is not a people’s agenda, it is not a people’s revolution but a
rearranging of chairs on the ruling party’s high table. My fear is premised on the fact that, most
people just want Mugabe to go without laying on the table what we envisage for
the future of our country. This is the same dilemma that hogged the opposition
while accepting the GNU and the COPAC constitution saying ‘it’s better than a no
deal.’ Whereas it was only years to come
that they realised that the ‘better’ deal was actually nothing on the surface.
Equally, events of the past days
were largely triggered by Mugabe’s firing of his vice president Emmerson
Mnangagwa, the newly anointed ‘crown prince’ of the securocrats. The eventual dismissal of Mnangagwa from
government came after verbal attacks directed to his person and the military.
The ‘coup’ was long brewing, it was just a matter of day and time, but Grace
Mugabe became its trigger. The purges of senior leaders of ZANU PF aligned to
Mnangagwa prompted the military chiefs to step in and stop Mugabe because they
also felt threatened. They realised that
the axe was also going to fall on their necks if the succession events in the
ruling party had continued on the same trajectory; hence, they had to pre-emptively
strike. The generals have achieved their mission, they wanted the purges to
stop, they did. They wanted to stop the dynasty project. They did. They wanted
to take power from the G40, they did. They wanted Mnangagwa to be at congress,
he will be.
 |
| The conspirators? Emmerson Mnangagwa and Gen Chiwenga |
Historically, the major
political contradictions in Zimbabwe have always been resolved by the gun. Here
I refer to five historical events that were resolved by the gun. Firstly, it was the First Chimurenga (War of
liberation) in 1896, which was a contest between the colonisers versus the
people of Zimbabwe, a war which we eventually lost resulting in the
colonisation of Zimbabwe. Secondly, the second Chimurenga which was Smith’s UDI
versus that ZANLA/ZIPRA affair. Thirdly, it was post-independence, in the 1980s
and that featured Joshua Nkomo versus Mugabe, which resulted in the massacring
of more than 20 000 people in Matabeleland during Gukurahundi. Fourthly,
the MDC versus ZANU PF in 2008, when the military factor became a crucial
element in resolving the political contradictions, thereby keeping President
Mugabe in power. The last of such events is the succession question we are
currently witnessing in ZANU PF which is now being solved by the gun. George
Charamba, Mugabe’s spokesperson for 17 years told Financial Times that Mr
Mugabe’s fate would be decided by those wielding power and not by the will of
the people. “What we see in the streets is just atmospherics,” he said. More
importantly, what we are currently witnessing is problem solving of the ZANU PF
succession, now being handled, executed and directed by the gun after Mugabe
had suppressed that debate and by default making himself life president of
Zimbabwe.
However, as many Zimbabweans in
and outside the country were celebrating Mugabe’s ‘demise’ which has been
instigated by the gun, they should think about the future. From a fair analysis
without attaching any emotions the coup is a ‘family (ZANU) affair’ and General
Chiwenga was unequivocal in his 13th of November 2017 statement that
it’s a military resolution of internal party contradictions. As a result it has
nothing to do with the generality of the populace, not even democracy rather a
self-correction of ZANU PF as it solves its succession. It has always been a power
tussle that dates back from Zimbabwe’s war of liberation between the
nationalists (political leadership) and the military leadership who were
playing different roles in the war. Mugabe, a civilian (who has no military
background) was supported by the military in his ascendancy to the throne in 1977. Forty years down the line, the military is
featuring again to remove Mugabe and replacing him with another trained soldier
Emmerson Mnangagwa. Secondly, the military chiefs are now an economic
class with its own distinct interests and this is a 'military class project' to
keep hands over the party-state apparatus no matter which angle you look at it.
The alleged involvement of the army elites in the Chiadzwa diamonds are a case
in point. Thirdly, the coup has exposed that Zimbabwe’s opposition has paid
heavily for being directionless and unable to build a cohesive social and
political project. The failure of the opposition even to reform or renew itself
will be their greatest downfall if ever they are going to gain space in the
wake of a rejuvenated ZANU PF.
Going forward, Zimbabwe should
retain to civilian order and allow the constitution to be respected. They must
be a clear framework, that at least should try to involve the people or rather
any transitional mechanisms should lead to reforms and ultimately a democratic
election. The people of Zimbabwe should be given a chance to choose a
government of their choice, but Alas! the events in the past few days indicate
that we will always be asked to participate in civic affairs with the nozzle of
the gun on our head in the immediate and foreseeable future. Therefore, it is
critical to create conditions for a free and fair election so that we will have
a government that is elected by the people. Free and fair elections are the
only way to have a legitimate government and retain to civilian rule. The
question again is, will the new dispensation create those conditions for a free
and fair elections? If yes, will the military accept a ZANU PF electoral defeat
given their strong vested interests in the ruling party and role in aiding ZANU
PF to remain in power even despite losing in 2008? For the pro-democratic
forces, the question is how do they build progressive political platforms that
can be seen as part of the National Democratic Revolution? How do progressive
forces mobilise to deepen a structurally deep movement which makes the
transformation national and not be subjugated and domineered by the factions in
the national liberation movement? They should continue mobilising on the ground
and be relevant in the struggles ahead. However, given the fragmentation in the
opposition and lack of cogent policies to address the socio-politico-economic
crisis ZANU PF has somehow managed to solve its complex succession question.
This means after they are finished with addressing the self-cannibalising that
was threatening to tear them apart, that machinery will be re-directed at the
opposition and civil society with much viciousness.
President Mugabe’s speech read
on the 20th of November 2017, whilst flanked by all the security
forces was a tell-tale sign and this was confirmed by Patrick Chinamasa’s
utterances after the Central Committee meeting held on the same day that
it was a ZANU PF affair and they did not need the opposition on the dinner
table. In addition, the military apparatchiks released a statement on the 21st
of November 2017, that ‘Operation Restore Legacy’ had been successful and it
was time to go back to normal life. The question that begs to the military and
ZANU PF is: what happened to the people’s revolution? Maybe it was never about
the people but ZANU PF and its survival. The opposition, civil society and
Zimbabweans in general need to avoid being easily excitable otherwise they will
keep on being taken on a wild goose chase in Zimbabwe’s politics.
NB: Views expressed in this
article are personal
Blessing Vava is a research
fellow at the University of the Witwatersrand, Africa-China reporting
department. He can be contacted on blessingvava@gmail.com.
Twitter: @blevava
